Perry Johnson & Associates Medical Transcription Data Security Breach Litigation
The causation theory in this data breach case hinges on the exposure of PHI and PII during a specific period, which is argued to be the factual and legal cause of harms such as identity theft, financial fraud, and emotional distress. Courts typically require plaintiffs to demonstrate that the breach was a proximate cause of the damages, with the exposure increasing the risk of harm and thus establishing causation.
57
Pending actions
57
Total actions filed
Active
Status
01/30/2024
Established
Filing deadline
No explicit filing deadlines or statutes of limitations are publicly documented; deadlines related to settlement claims or objections are likely set around the final approval date or in subsequent court orders.
Who qualifies
Plaintiffs must have been patients whose PHI or PII was compromised during the breach period in 2023, involving medical transcription records containing sensitive health and personal data. The claims focus on security failures leading to unauthorized access and disclosure of such data, resulting in harms like identity theft, fraud, and emotional distress.
Alleged injuries
- Identity theft
- Financial fraud
- Emotional distress
- Costs of credit monitoring
Bellwether trials
No specific bellwether trial dates or verdicts have been publicly reported; case is in settlement approval phase with a scheduled final approval hearing on February 11, 2026.
Settlement landscape
No specific settlement amount has been publicly disclosed. Benchmark data from recent healthcare data breach settlements suggest awards ranging from approximately $2.9 million to over $3 million, with potential for higher damages in cases involving severe harm or regulatory penalties.
Lead counsel
- Christopher A. Wiech
This page is generated from the official JPML pending-MDL report and public court records, refreshed monthly. It is provided for attorney reference and is not legal advice.
