All active MDLs
MDL 2967Data Privacy & Security

Clearview AI, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation

The causation theory in MDL-2967 centers on the unauthorized collection and use of biometric data, primarily facial images, which leads to privacy violations, psychological distress, and increased risks of identity theft. Court documents and expert reports emphasize that these harms are caused by the unlawful scraping and storage of biometric identifiers without consent, violating laws such as the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (BIPA). The documented harms include emotional distress from privacy breaches and the potential for biometric data misuse in identity theft, with legal arguments focusing on the direct causation of these harms by Clearview AI's practices.

ILNU.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson ColemanMaster docket 1:21-cv-135Source: JPML · Updated March 24, 2026

0

Pending actions

14

Total actions filed

Active

Status

12/15/2020

Established

Filing deadline

The initial filings date back to August 2020. The Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (BIPA) generally provides a 5-year statute of limitations for biometric privacy claims, which suggests claims filed after August 2025 may be barred unless extended or tolled through court-approved procedures. Specific claim deadlines are tied to the settlement process, with claim submission periods typically within 30-60 days after settlement approval.

Who qualifies

Individuals whose facial biometric data was collected or processed by Clearview AI without proper consent from approximately 2017 to 2019, primarily from publicly available internet sources, and who reside in Illinois or other states with biometric privacy laws. Class members include those whose images were scraped from social media and online platforms without explicit permission. The class includes individuals who suffered privacy violations, psychological distress, or potential identity theft due to the unauthorized collection and storage of biometric data.

Products involved

  • facial recognition technology
  • biometric data collection system

Alleged injuries

  • Privacy violations due to unauthorized biometric data collection
  • Psychological distress caused by privacy breaches
  • Increased risk of identity theft and financial fraud from biometric data misuse

Bellwether trials

Most of the MDL-2967 case has been resolved through a court-approved settlement in March 2025, valued at approximately $51.75 million. There are no upcoming bellwether trials scheduled, and recent verdicts are not reported, indicating the case is largely settled.

Settlement landscape

The case resulted in a $51.75 million settlement approved in 2025, which included monetary awards and equity stakes for class members. The settlement also imposed restrictions on Clearview AI’s data collection practices and mandated compliance with biometric privacy laws, notably BIPA.

Lead counsel

  • Loevy & Loevy

This page is generated from the official JPML pending-MDL report and public court records, refreshed monthly. It is provided for attorney reference and is not legal advice.

MDL Match

Your next intake could have a mass tort hiding in it.

Screen it against 158+ active MDLs. Takes under 60 seconds.

Start matching now