Delta Dental Antitrust Litigation
The causation theory is based on the allegation that Delta Dental used its monopsony power to manipulate reimbursement rates and territorial divisions, thereby suppressing competition and harming dental providers financially. This abuse of market power led to reduced reimbursements, limited provider participation, and restricted market access, which collectively caused economic harm to providers and reduced competition in the dental insurance market [CourtListener](https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/258174/in-re-delta-dental-antitrust-litigation), [Keller Rohrback](https://www.kellerrohrback.com/currentcases/delta-dental-antitrust-litigation).
27
Pending actions
28
Total actions filed
Active
Status
03/27/2020
Established
Who qualifies
A plaintiff must have experienced financial harm through reduced reimbursement rates, market access limitations due to territorial restrictions, or harm from anti-competitive practices such as market division and monopolization. The harm must have occurred within the relevant period, typically after the alleged practices began, and involve direct participation or contractual relationships with Delta Dental. Evidence of reduced income, restricted provider participation, or exclusion from certain geographic markets qualifies.
Products involved
- Delta Dental insurance plans
- Network participation agreements
- Reimbursement rate structures
- Market division agreements
- Dental provider networks
Alleged injuries
- Reduced reimbursement rates impacting dental providers' revenue
- Restricted market access for dental providers due to territorial divisions
- Reduced competition in the dental insurance market
- Market monopolization and suppression of consumer choice
- Increased out-of-pocket costs for patients
This page is generated from the official JPML pending-MDL report and public court records, refreshed monthly. It is provided for attorney reference and is not legal advice.
